NFL Forums

Pacers 121 Knicks 107 It's not a series until the road team wins a game, so we fan finally get this thing started on Tuesday

6 threes is a high bar but still I'm surprised more guys haven't done that. You could have told me Fred van vleet was on that list and I'd accept it

Knew it. We’ve been trying to copy the Bengals offense. In 2023, the Browns were in 11 personnel 73% of the time, good for seventh in the league. The Los Angeles Rams topped the list at 95% with the Carolina Panthers (89%) and Cincinnati Bengals (81%) the only other teams above 80% in 2023. It makes sense given how many talented WRs come out in the draft every year.

Huh? Pearce is amazing. He’s gonna be a top 5 player, even if he is light in the pants.

A lot of the content comes from A-Z sports. I have read a fair amount of Mike Payton's articles and he is a pretty solid reporter.

Why are you only including sack totals? Part of why I'm not terribly impressed by Hendrickson is that he is one-dimensional. His total solo tackles for the past 4 years are: 28 22 21 22 Meanwhile Mack had 57 last year, along with 17 sacks. He's just a much more dangerous and versatile defender when healthy. Josh Allen had 17.5 sacks and 43 solo tackles, I'd much rather have him going forward. Obviously an ascending player who does much more on the field than Hendrickson. Brian Burns I consider to be easily a better player, he's just mired on a terrible team. Just open your eyes and watch the tape. He's not going to get sack totals when opposing offenses always have the lead and can dictate the game. I mean, I've watch them all play. I'd rather have a twitchy guy with upside that teams are afraid of than ole reliable Hutchinson who will get you a sack once a game due to his high-motor and patient rush style, but is not a threat to whip a starting caliber OT with a lightning first step or bull rush with incredible strength. Traits matter. If I'm going into a game vs the Bengals, Hendrickson is not really a concern. You have to block him, obviously, but he's not a disruptive pass rusher. I'm allowed to create whatever criteria I choose. Who are you to tell me otherwise? You are really criticizing me for bringing more evidence to the table? I'm not allowed to amend my initial statement? You have no authority here. I watch the games, I've seen plenty of Hendrickson, and my opinion is his impact on the field is less than what it shows on the stat sheet. Fair enough, I'll back off that he's average. He's an above average pass rusher and IMO a below average run defender. Overall I'll give him an above average grade, but let's not pretend this is some difference maker here. If we can return to the main topic, my point is if your best player is a high-motor guy who will give you 1 sack a game but nothing else, your defense probably won't be good.

Lynyrd skynyd if they grew up m in LA

Familiar with Burns and Kurtz. Feels like Burns would be my preferred choice, but I doubt the Cardinals are going to be anywhere near close enough to be picking him.

Maye vs Brissett - is a genuine battle, that Brissett will win a battle of, but Maye will win the war Wallace Vs Okarafor - for LT. God help us and our QB’s blind side Osborne Vs Douglas Vs Bourne - for the primary slot Receiver White Vs Wise - DE Ryland vs Slye

Jets always seem to lag behind the signing of rooks. Mgmt. I think is looking at probably adding another player or 2 and create cap space for future cut players they will add later during the season or before the season begins. So IMHO I think it has more to do with cap space than it does taking their time signing players.